Quote of Arran
Hard to tell who you are quoting here, since many people posted their complaints.
I'm trying to find the throughline in your post, but I cannot spot it, so I'll split some things up here for my own sake.
I think you own a reference card since you are talking about "+5% PL and end up with 320 Watt of TBP.
The MERC310 is actually a reference card with minor changes, but flashed with a different performance bios. So we are slightly discussing a different story here.
When I
posted that Cyberpunk picture it shows [1440p/ultra settings] 144FPS (capped). It's impossible to run CP2077 on 144FPS with RayTracing turned on. So that was with the setting turned OFF.
Yea, maybe.
I eventually came to the same conclusion. The GPU is supported by the sub frame. The impact of the PCB bent is neglectable and I agree with you about the aesthetic thing. The block disperses a vast amount of heat, luckily my radiator setup is beyond regular to extract it fast enough. Not everyone has these 'fat' rads.
Quote of Arran about 30% overclocking
So many numbers in this thread it's becoming dazzling.
AMD's reference card has a
boostclock of 2400MHz. The performance bios on the
MERC310 Black runs on about
2736MHz. That's a
14% overclock. AMD's reference TBP of 315W. The XFX MERC on approximately 349W. That's a 4.5% increase.
REFERENCE BIOS BENCHMARK
You forced me to run a benchmark with the reference bios on the MERC310 Black edition.
2400MHz boost clock with only 309W TBP. Not convinced yet?
View attachment 5485
Some of us place waterblocks for aesthetics, some for improved cooling performance and some for silent builds. I know performance is a variable thing, but check the following pictures.
AIRCOOLER PERFORMANCE
This was screenshotted with the factory heatsink (
aircooler). Left side 35%ish fanspeed, right 100% fans.
View attachment 5483
----------
WEBSITE INFO
I purchased for improved cooling, so RDNA3 can do it's thing and clock better with lower voltages. Like written on the product page.
View attachment 5484
So where did you pull the 30% overclock from? Who are you trying to defend here?
Apologize me for the boring lecture
I have some parts on the way, like a modified block to close this once and for all.
There is this theory in my mind where I have an assumption that the GCD is placed slightly lower than the memory complex dies.
View attachment 5486
Stay tuned for mid September.